The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by LVNV Funding LLC against Arnold Pajar on Aug. 11: 'Hearing On Osc Re: Failure To File Proof Of Service/Prosecute Case'.
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 28. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 22. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 20. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 17. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 14. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 7. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on July 6. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 29. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 25. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 22. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 18. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 9. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 8. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on May 29. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Autovest L. L. C. against Jesse Jesse Arnold on May 29: 'Clerk's Tickler On Consumer Credit Collections Case-Check For Filing Of Default Judgment Within 360 Days Of Filing Complaint'.
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on May 21. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on May 18. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on May 13. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: