SAN FRANCISCO — Brentwood attorney Walter Lee Davis has been
disbarred in the wake of charges of professional misconduct,
according to the State Bar of California website.
The ruling, which was effective Dec. 4, 2016, by order of the
state Supreme Court, stemmed from charges against Davis that involved
endorsing personal-injury settlement checks, misappropriating
client’s settlement funds, and mishandling his client trust
According to court
documents, the first count of misconduct — referred to as the
Cook Matter — allegedly involved several violations of the
California Rules of Professional Conduct. Davis was hired to
represent a client in a personal-injury suit. On Aug. 4, 2014, Davis
signed a claim release on behalf of the client without authorization.
On Aug. 12, Davis received $9,000 in settlement funds — at least
$6,000 of which the client and the client’s medical provider were
entitled — but failed to notify the client. Davis failed to
maintain a balance of $6,000 in his client trust account and
allegedly misappropriated the funds. In addition, Davis relayed to
the client that he had not received the settlements funds, claiming
that they had been mailed to an incorrect address, and did not
provide the client with an accounting of the funds when asked.
On Sept. 19, 2014, Davis allegedly engaged in similar acts of
misconduct with a second client. On that date, according to court
documents, Davis received settlement funds totaling $7,800 on
behalf of his client, but failed to notify the client. He then
proceeded to endorse the check without the client’s authorization
and deposited it into his client trust account. Davis allowed the
account balance to fall below the $5,200 owed to the client and his
medical providers. The attorney told the client in this matter, as in
the first, that he had not received the settlement funds.
The State Bar Court of California recommended that Bentley be
A Notice of Disciplinary Charges was sent to the attorney via mail
to the address provided on his membership record. Several further
attempts to contact Davis via different mediums were made to no
avail. In the aftermath of the State Bar employing reasonable
diligence to contact Davis with no response, a default plea was
entered into record. Davis had 45 days from the date when the default
was entered to request a have his it set aside or vacated. No such
request was made.
9.20 of the California Rules of Court, Davis will be required to
notify all of his clients of the ruling, deliver any papers necessary
to clients in regards to their cases, return any fees that remain
unearned, and alert opposing counsel in any pending litigation of his
According to his profile page
on the State Bar website, Davis was first admitted to the State Bar
Court documents for all State Bar Court of California cases can be
found online at calbar.ca.gov.