SAN FRANCISCO – An Oakland man alleges a debt collector continued to call after he revoked his consent.
Bosco Kante filed a complaint on Oct. 7 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Rash Curtis & Associates alleging violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on July 15, 2013, he sent a letter to the defendant requesting that it cease and desist all telephone communications with him and to validate the alleged debt it was trying to collect. He alleges that his request was ignored as the calls from the defendant continued.
The plaintiff holds Rash Curtis & Associates responsible because the defendant allegedly failed to cease calls despite revocation of express consent and unlawfully utilized an auto-dialer or pre-recorded voice.
The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against defendant, damages, attorneys' fees, costs and further relief as the court deems just. He is representing himself.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Case number 3:16-cv-05807