SAN FRANCISCO – A man alleges a lantern handle seller failed to warn consumers of exposure to health hazards through its products.

Laurence Vinocur filed a complaint on March 6 in the San Francisco County Superior Court against Streamlight Inc. alleging violation of a section of Proposition 65.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendant failed to warn California consumers of the risks of exposure to lead and di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) from vinyl/PVC lantern handles manufactured, distributed and sold by the defendant. 

The plaintiff holds Streamlight Inc. responsible because the defendant allegedly failed to provide a clear and reasonable warning to consumers of the exposure of lead and DEHP from the use of its products.

The plaintiff seeks judgment against defendants in the amount of $2,500 per day for each violation, attorneys' fees, a recall of the defendant's products that do not have a warning as defined by California code, costs of suit and further relief as may be just. He is represented by Laralei Paras of The Chanler Group in Berkeley.

San Francisco County Superior Court case number CGC-18-564803

Want to get notified whenever we write about Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco ?
Next time we write about Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco




More News