Gaba Guerrini Law Corporation

Recent News About Gaba Guerrini Law Corporation View More

• Nov. 15: Contra Costa Superior Court docket for "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" cases

  By Northern California Record | Tuesday, Nov 23, 2021 @ 7:16am

  The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on Nov. 15. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:

  ---

• 

  Oct. 22: Contra Costa Superior Court docket for "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" cases

  By Northern California Record | Saturday, Oct 30, 2021 @ 8:56am

  The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on Oct. 22. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:

  ---

• 

  April 26: Contra Costa Superior Court docket for "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" cases

  By Northern California Record | Tuesday, May 4, 2021 @ 7:16am

  The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on April 26. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:

  ---

• 

  June 1: Contra Costa Superior Court docket for "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" cases

  By Northern California Record | Tuesday, Jun 9, 2020 @ 8:39am

  The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on June 1. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:

  ---

• Dec. 2: Contra Costa Superior Court docket for "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" cases

  By Record Inc News Service | Tuesday, Dec 10, 2019 @ 7:21am

  The following cases categorized as "consumer credit collections cmpl (crc 3.740)" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on Dec. 2. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:

  ---