Lyft
Recent News About Lyft
-
New California law makes it easier for some workers to be contractors; but not Uber, Lyft drivers
A bill that recently passed the California legislature and was signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom makes it easier for freelance writers, musicians, photographers and other occupations to continue working as contractors. -
Sept. 1: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Sept. 1. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on Sept. 1
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on Sept. 1 in the suits below: -
Case activity for Jacqueline Day vs unnamed defendants on Sept. 1
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Jacqueline Day against Bashir Sulymankhel, Lyft Inc., Mojib Mohammad, Rasier Ca LLC, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. and other unnamed defendants on Sept. 1. -
Aug. 17: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Aug. 17. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on Aug. 17
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on Aug. 17 in the suits below: -
Uber, Lyft granted stay in AB5 court case; ‘Argument the companies keep making is we are platforms, we are go-betweens’
The court battle to reclassify Uber and Lyft drivers as employees in accordance with AB5 may exacerbate California’s unemployment rate if the companies follow through on intimations to move out of state. -
Case activity for Ankur Gupta vs unnamed defendants on Aug. 17
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Ankur Gupta against Larry Washington, Lyft Inc. and other unnamed defendants on Aug. 17. -
California labor commissioner sues Uber, Lyft over driver classification
California’s labor commissioner has sued Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. for classifying drivers as contractors instead of employees. -
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on July 27
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on July 27 in the suits below: -
July 27: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 27. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Case activity for Thomas Hang vs Usman Bhatti on July 27
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Thomas Hang against Germaine Last, Lyft Inc., Uber Technoligies Inc., Usman Bhatti and other unnamed defendants on July 27. -
Case activity for Josephine Andeade vs Jui Chen on July 27
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Josephine Andeade and Lucy Chavez against Jui Chen, Lyft Inc., Rosendo Benavides Sotelo and other unnamed defendants on July 27. -
July 2: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 2. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on July 2
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on July 2 in the suits below: -
June 30: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on June 30. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Court activity on July 2: Arshak Ben Kerelian vs Anghesome Kidane
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity in the suit brought by Arshak Ben Kerelian against Anghesome Kidane, Lyft Inc., Rasier Ca LLC, Rasier LLC, Uatc LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. and other unnamed defendants on July 2: 'Summons Issued To Plaintiff Kerelian, Arshak Ben'. -
May 26: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on May 26. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
State seeks court order to mandate Uber, Lyft drivers as employees; CJAC says it will worsen unemployment
Civil Justice Association foresees lawsuit against Uber and Lyft will further COVID-19 unemployment rather than reverse it -
April 23: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on April 23. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: