News from October 2020
Next COVID-19 relief bill remains stalled in Washington; ‘Adverse impacts on the economy and individuals will be longer-lasting than they could have been’
With the outcome for a new COVID-19 financial stimulus package still in flux, concerns about the lasting economic damage have heightened the longer the legislative stalemate goes on.
Ruling due soon on legal challenge to Newsom’s executive orders; ‘We are fighting for the form of government we’re all permitted to under the Constitution’
A Sutter County Superior Court judge is expected to issue an initial ruling this week in a lawsuit challenging an executive order on voting as well as more than 50 others Gov. Gavin Newsom has issued during the COVID-19 pandemic.
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP: Greenberg Traurig Shareholders Speak at 2020 Privacy + Security Forum
Ian C. Ballon, JD, LLM, CIPP/US, Gretchen A. Ramos, CIPP/US, CIPP/EU, CIPM, Jena M. Valdetero, CIPP/US, and David A. Zetoony, all shareholders at global law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP, spoke at the 2020 Privacy + Security Forum to be held Oct. 21 – 23. Greenberg Traurig is also a sponsor of the forum.
GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP: Greenberg Traurig’s David Bloch Presents in DC Bar Virtual Class: “Preserving Intellectual Property Rights in Government Contracts 2020”
Shareholder David S. Bloch of global law firm Greenberg Traurig, LLP’s San Francisco office will speak in the DC Bar’s virtual class, “Preserving Intellectual Property Rights in Government Contracts 2020,” held October 21 and 28.
WILSON ELSER: Emerging Employment Challenges in the COVID-19 Environment
Bruno Katz (Partner-San Diego) will join 75-minute webinar, “Emerging Employment Challenges in the COVID-19 Environment,” sponsored by the California Insurance Wholesalers Association on October 29, 2020.
Case activity for Charles Smith vs Walgreens Co. on Oct. 23
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Charles Smith against Walgreens Co. on Oct. 23.
Court activity on Oct. 23: Celia Rivera vs Victor Palmer Sr
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity in the suit brought by Celia Rivera against Victor Palmer Sr on Oct. 23: 'Request To Keep Minor's Information Confidential (confidential) Filed By Petitioner Rivera, Celia'.
Case activity for Martina Murphy vs Cumulus Radio Corp. on Oct. 23
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Emmet Bredan Ward, Lorraine Gallagher Ward, Martina Murphy, Sansome Potrero LLC and Thomas F. Murphy against Cumulus Radio Corp., Liberty Park Management Inc. and other unnamed defendants on Oct. 23.
Case activity for Michael Domino vs Kentucky Fried Chicken on Oct. 23
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Michael Domino against Kentucky Fried Chicken, Samantha 249 Inc. and Taco Bell on Oct. 23.
Court activity on Sept. 29: Fowzya Zia vs Jason Cornell
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Fahimah Khalil, Fowzya Zia, Milika Zia and Zulaikha Zia against Jason Cornell on Sept. 29: 'Copies'.
Case activity for Ralf Knoll vs unnamed defendants on Oct. 22
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Ralf Knoll against Gilead Sciences Inc. and other unnamed defendants on Oct. 22.
Court activity on Oct. 6: Franklin Credit Management Corp. vs Russel V. Watts
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Franklin Credit Management Corp. against County of Contra Costa, California and Russel V. Watts on Oct. 6: 'Notice Of/To Intent To Appear By Telephone Filed By Russel V Watts, County Of Contra Costa, California'.
Oct. 6: Contra Costa Superior Court docket for "civil petition" cases
The following cases categorized as "civil petition" were on the docket in the Contra Costa Superior Court on Oct. 6. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
Court activity on Oct. 22: Lola Mae Vancil vs Steven Wayne Seda
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Lola Mae Vancil against Steven Wayne Seda on Oct. 22: 'Hearing On Request For Restraining Orders Re: Civil Harassment, Filed By Lola Mae Vancil'.
Court activity on Oct. 5: Gerard Oliver vs Tekia Harris
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Gerard Oliver against Tekia Harris on Oct. 5: '(elder/dependent Adult Abuse) Proof Of Personal Service Filed. Elder/dependent Adult Abuse Filed 09/30/2020 Of Gerard Oliver Served To Tekia Harris On 10/01/20.'.
Court activity on Oct. 23: Synchrony Bank vs Laura Simmons
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Synchrony Bank against Laura Simmons on Oct. 23: 'Hearing On Osc Re: Failure To File Proof Of Service/Prosecute Case'.
Court activity on Oct. 22: George Smith vs Credit One Financial
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by George Smith against Credit One Bank, N.A. and Credit One Financial on Oct. 22: 'Check For Proof Of Service'.
Case activity for Michelle D. Gentry vs Mario Molina on Sept. 30
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by Michelle D. Gentry against Mario Molina on Sept. 30.
Court activity on Oct. 23: Synchrony Bank vs John Cenicola
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Synchrony Bank against John Cenicola on Oct. 23: 'Hearing On Osc Re: Failure To File Proof Of Service/Prosecute Case'.
Oct. 16: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "petition for legal separation without children" cases
The following cases categorized as "petition for legal separation without children" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Oct. 16. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: