Quantcast

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORD

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Couple claims Enrich Financial did not provide services advertised

General court 01

shutterstock.com

LOS ANGELES – A Los Angeles County couple alleges a corporation made false and misleading claims regarding its services.

Lolita Aleksanian and Alen Issagholian filed a complaint on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated on March 27 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Enrich Financial Inc. alleging violation of the California False Advertising Act and the Unfair Competition Law.

According to the complaint, the plaintiffs allege that they purchased credit repair services, credit card and loan settlement and representation for collection matters from the defendant in June 2016. The plaintiffs allege these services were never provided and that they would never have purchased them if they had been properly advertised. The plaintiffs hold Enrich Financial Inc. responsible because the defendant allegedly misled the plaintiffs that it would provide credit repair services.

The plaintiffs seek an order for the defendant to engage in a corrective advertising, actual damages, restitution, punitive damages, statutory enhanced damages, interest, all legal fees and any other relief as the court deems just. They are represented by Todd M. Friedman, Meghan E. George and Adrian R. Bacon of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman PC in Woodland Hills.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Case number 2:17-cv-02359-CAS-KS

More News