News from November 2019
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on Nov. 4
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on Nov. 4 in the suits below:
Nov. 4: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "securities/investment" cases
The following cases categorized as "securities/investment" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Nov. 4. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
Nov. 4: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Nov. 4. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
Alameda County Superior Court: Actions Taken on Nov. 4
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity on Nov. 4 in the suits below:
Nov. 4: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "contract/warranty" cases
The following cases categorized as "contract/warranty" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Nov. 4. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
FBAC exec: Proposed ballot initiative by ride-hailing coalition 'would not mitigate other problems' with AB 5
SACRAMENTO – A coalition of Uber, Lyft and DoorDash drivers last month submitted a ballot initiative to the California Secretary of State’s Office in an effort by ride-hailing companies to undo AB 5, which makes it more difficult for companies to classify gig economy workers as contractors.
SHEPPARD MULLIN: Webinar - Government Use of Blockchain: What Government Contractors Need to Know
Many U.S. government agencies have started using blockchain technology. This usage is predicted to grow rapidly, providing great opportunities for forward-thinking government contractors.
SHEPPARD MULLIN: Sheppard Mullin’s Robert J. Stumpf, Jr. Elected to Board of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP is pleased to announce that Robert J. Stumpf, Jr. has been elected to the Board of the American Academy of Appellate Lawyers (AAAL).
Nov. 4: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "common counts/open book account/collections" cases
The following cases categorized as "common counts/open book account/collections" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Nov. 4. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
REED SMITH LLP: Leading Privacy, Cybersecurity & Data Protection Partner Sarah Bruno Joins Reed Smith
Reed Smith announced today that Sarah L. Bruno has joined Reed Smith as a partner in its global IP, Tech & Data Group, resident in the firm’s San Francisco office. Thpe firm welcomes Bruno along with experienced privacy lawyer, Casey T. Perrino, who joins as an associate.
FAEGRE BAKERS DANIELS: Enforcing Charitable Pledges and Defensive Estate Planning for Nonprofits
Over the next 25 years, it is estimated that baby boomers will transfer more than $60 billion, and studies show that a significant portion of that wealth will pass into the hands of nonprofit organizations and charities.
Stanford law expert on independent contractor law: 'There’s inevitably going to be litigation'
SACRAMENTO – A coalition started by Uber, Lyft and DoorDash drivers and supporters last month submitted a ballot initiative to the California Secretary of State’s Office in an effort to undo Assembly Bill 5 – a new law that will make it more difficult for companies to classify gig economy workers as contractors.
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash team up to fight independent contractor law AB 5
SACRAMENTO – A coalition of ride-hailing companies and supporters led by Uber, Lyft and DoorDash last month submitted a ballot initiative to the California Secretary of State’s Office in an effort to undo Assembly Bill 5, a new law that will make it more difficult for companies to classify gig economy workers as contractors.
Court activity on Nov. 8: Michael Clay vs Confluent Medical Technologies Inc.
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Michael Clay and Windy Clay against Confluent Medical Technologies Inc., Cordis Corp. and Johnson & Johnson on Nov. 8: 'Complaint-Product Liability Filed'.
Case activity for Yolanda Torres vs Rebecca Banuelos on Oct. 18
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by Yolanda Torres against Rebecca Banuelos on Oct. 18.
Court activity on Nov. 8: John Doe vs Avis Budget Group Inc.
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by John Doe against Avis Budget Group Inc. on Nov. 8: 'Complaint-Wrongful Termination Filed'.
Court activity on Nov. 8: Amir Ashtiani vs Applied Materials Inc.
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Amir Ashtiani against Applied Materials Inc., Carl Johnson and Ron Dedore on Nov. 8: 'Complaint-Wrongful Termination Filed'.
Court activity on Nov. 8: Urbane Recovery, LLC vs Hector Krauss
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Urbane Recovery, LLC against Hector Krauss and Hemss Family Investments, LLC on Nov. 8: 'Check For Request For Entry Of Default'.
Case activity for Urbane Recovery, LLC vs Hector Krauss on Oct. 24
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activities in the suit brought by Urbane Recovery, LLC against Hector Krauss and Hemss Family Investments, LLC on Oct. 24.
Court activity on Nov. 8: Capital One Bank USA N.A. vs Mario Demerling
The Contra Costa Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Capital One Bank USA N.A. against Mario Demerling on Nov. 8: 'Clerk's Tickler On Consumer Credit Collections Case-Check For Filing Of Default Judgment Within 360 Days Of Filing Complaint'.