Quantcast

Consumer claims debt collector did not verify debt as he requested

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORD

Friday, November 22, 2024

Consumer claims debt collector did not verify debt as he requested

Late 06

SACRAMENTO – A Placer County consumer alleges a debt collector did not provide the information he requested.

Jordan Langley filed a complaint on Feb. 9 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California against Hunt & Henriques Inc. and Does 1-10 alleging violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and other counts.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that in January 2016, the defendant mailed him a letter in an attempt to collect an alleged debt. The suit states the plaintiff sent a letter to the defendant requesting verification of the alleged debt and to mark on the plaintiff's report that the debt was disputed. The plaintiff holds Hunt & Henriques Inc. and Does 1-10 responsible because the defendants allegedly failed to update plaintiff's credit to reflect that he disputed the alleged debt and did not send verification of the debt.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks actual damages, statutory damages, all legal fees and any other relief as this court deems just. He is represented by Todd M. Friedman and Adrian R. Bacon of Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman PC in Woodland Hills.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California Case number 2:17-cv-00281-WBS-EFB

More News