At&T
Recent News About At&T
-
Alameda County Superior Court: Actions Taken on April 22
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity on April 22 in the suits below: -
April 22: Alameda County Superior Court docket for breach of contract/warranty cases
The following breach of contract/warranty-related cases were on the docket in the Alameda County Superior Court on April 22. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Court activity on April 22: 1910 Fairway LLC vs AT&T Services Inc.
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by 1910 Fairway LLC against AT&T Services Inc. on April 22: 'Complaint Breach Of Contract/Warranty Filed' -
Court activity on April 2: Luisa Flores vs AT&T Services Inc.
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Luisa Flores, Elizabeth Morales, Olga Rangel and Octavio Roave against AT&T Services Inc. and Pacific Bell Telephone Company on April 2: 'Complaint-Wrongful Termination Filed' -
April 2: Alameda County Superior Court docket for wrongful termination cases
The following wrongful termination-related cases were on the docket in the Alameda County Superior Court on April 2. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Alameda County Superior Court: Actions Taken on April 2
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity on April 2 in the suits below: -
Federal judge says cell phone tax challenge case belongs in state court
Judge Morrison England Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued a memorandum and order on March 20 in the matter of Bekkerman v. Calif. Board of Equalization et al, remanding the case back to a state trial court. -
AT&T heads back to court for impending class-action suit over data-throttling
SAN FRANCISCO -- The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will decide whether or not a group of consumers can continue with their class-action lawsuit against telecommunications giant AT&T. The consumers seek to hold AT&T legally responsible for their "data-throttling" practices.