Uber
Recent News About Uber
-
Uber, Lyft, DoorDash team up to fight independent contractor law AB 5
SACRAMENTO – A coalition of ride-hailing companies and supporters led by Uber, Lyft and DoorDash last month submitted a ballot initiative to the California Secretary of State’s Office in an effort to undo Assembly Bill 5, a new law that will make it more difficult for companies to classify gig economy workers as contractors. -
CJAC president: Dynamex decision created 'minefield' for state's businesses
SACRAMENTO – California businesses are being left to carry the burden of the recent decision by the California Supreme Court and Assembly Bill 5, according to the president of the Civil Justice Association of California. -
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on Oct. 10
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on Oct. 10 in the suits below: -
Oct. 10: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Oct. 10. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Case activity for Brian L Reed vs Louis M Acuna on Oct. 10
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Brian L Reed against Louis M Acuna, Raiser LLC, Uber USA LLC and Veronica L Acuna on Oct. 10. -
California NFIB director: State's poor ranking on Lawsuit Climate Survey 'comes as no surprise'
SACRAMENTO – According to the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform’s 2019 Lawsuit Climate Survey, California is ranked 48th, and tthe legal environment may become more perilous for businesses as more progressive legislation continues to be introduced, an industry leader says. -
California Chamber: Independent contractor bill provides 'clarity and certainty' to 'Dynamex,' but more clarification needed
SACRAMENTO – California has passed landmark employment legislation that challenges the business model of gig-economy companies such as ride-hailing giants Uber Technologies and Lyft, some of the powerhouses of Silicon Valley over the past decade. -
Gig economy expert on AB 5: Bill 'will enhance the condition of drivers who work for these companies'
STANFORD – While business interests have denounced the recent passage of Assembly Bill 5, a measure that would seek to bring changes to the ability of businesses to designate workers as independent contractors, William Gould, a Stanford law professor and expert on the gig economy, believes that this change will bring more good than harm to the state of California and workers there. -
July 31: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "fraud" cases
The following cases categorized as "fraud" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 31. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Court activity on July 26: Uber Technologies vs Adaction Interactive LLC
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity in the suit brought by Uber Technologies against Adaction Interactive LLC, Bidmotion Inc., Hydrane Sas, Taptica Inc., Taptica Ltd., Youappi Inc. and other unnamed defendants on July 26: 'Stipulation And Proposed Order Extending Deadline To Respond To Complaint (transaction Id # 63633445) Filed By Defendant Hydrane Sas, A Foreign Corporation Bidmotion, Inc., A Delaware Corporation'. -
July 26: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "fraud" cases
The following cases categorized as "fraud" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 26. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
July 22: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "fraud" cases
The following cases categorized as "fraud" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 22. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Case activity for Uber Technologies vs Adaction Interactive LLC on July 24
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Uber Technologies against Adaction Interactive LLC, Bidmotion Inc., Hydrane Sas, Taptica Inc., Taptica Ltd., Youappi Inc. and other unnamed defendants on July 24: -
Court activity on July 22: Uber Technologies vs Adaction Interactive LLC
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity in the suit brought by Uber Technologies against Adaction Interactive LLC, Bidmotion Inc., Hydrane Sas, Taptica Inc., Taptica Ltd., Youappi Inc. and other unnamed defendants on July 22: 'Stipulation To Extend Time To Respond To Initial Complaint Under Crc 3.110(d) (transaction Id # 63616213) Filed By Youappi Inc.'. -
Court activity on July 31: Uber Technologies vs Adaction Interactive LLC
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity in the suit brought by Uber Technologies against Adaction Interactive LLC, Bidmotion Inc., Hydrane Sas, Taptica Inc., Taptica Ltd., Youappi Inc. and other unnamed defendants on July 31: 'Order - Stipulation And Order Extending Deadline To Respond To Complaint To Aug-12-2019' -
Court activity on July 18: Hadish Haile Gebremariam vs Mojib Mohammad
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity in the suit brought by Hadish Haile Gebremariam against Mojib Mohammad, Uber Technologies and other unnamed defendants on July 18: 'Answer To Complaint (transaction Id # 63557804) Filed By Defendant Mohammad, Mojib' -
July 10: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 10. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
July 11: Superior Court of California for San Francisco County docket for "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - vehicle related" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on July 11. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact: -
Case activity for Hadish Haile Gebremariam vs Mojib Mohammad on July 10
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Hadish Haile Gebremariam against Mojib Mohammad, Uber Technologies and other unnamed defendants on July 10: -
Superior Court of California for San Francisco County: Actions Taken on July 10
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on July 10 in the suits below: