Quantcast

Intuit Inc. alleged to have failed to pay overtime

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RECORD

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Intuit Inc. alleged to have failed to pay overtime

Law money 09

SAN DIEGO – A San Diego County woman formerly employed as a services and support representative alleges she was not paid an appropriate rate for overtime work.

Darci Myers, on behalf of herself and on behalf of others similarly situated, filed a complaint on June 16 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California against Intuit Inc. alleging that the defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that between November 2013 and March 2017, as a non-exempt seasonal and full-time employee of the defendant, plaintiff received Spotlight Bonuses just like other employees but was not compensated for overtime pay. Plaintiff alleges that the Spotlight Bonuses is a guise to effectively reduce overtime rate and lessens the company's overtime obligation to employees. 

The plaintiff holds Intuit Inc. responsible because the defendant allegedly failed to pay plaintiff overtime compensation at a rate of one-and-one-half times the regular rate of pay.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment for consequential, statutory and liquidated damages; an order to comply with applicable Labor Code; prejudgment interest; attorneys' fees; and such other relief that the court may deem just and proper. She is represented by Noam Glick and Kelsey McCarthy of Glick Law Group PC in San Diego and Craig M. Nicholas, Alex M. Tomasevic and Shaun Markley of Nicholas & Tomasevic LLP in San Diego.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California case number 3:17-cv-01228-WQH-BLM

More News