Consumer alleges Therapy Stores failed to include required Proposition 65 warnings on products

By Jenie Mallari-Torres | Jan 11, 2019

SAN FRANCISCO – A consumer alleges the sellers of vinyl-covered products failed to warn of the products' purported health hazards.

Dennis Johnson filed a complaint on Dec. 28 in the San Francisco County Superior Court against Therapy Stores Inc. and Does 1-50 alleging violation of Proposition 65.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants sell certain vinyl-covered cocktail shaker and beverage coaster sets and do not warn consumers about the risks of exposure to Diisononyl phthalate and lead allegedly in the products.

The plaintiff holds Therapy Stores Inc. and Does 1-50 responsible because the defendants allegedly failed to include the required health hazard warning on their products in violation of Proposition 65.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks for the court to assess civil penalties of $2,500 per day for every violation, attorneys' fees, costs of suit and further relief as may be just. He is represented by Josh Voorhees and Troy C. Bailey of Voorhees & Bailey LLP in Palo Alto.

San Francisco County Superior Court case number CGC-18-572403

Want to get notified whenever we write about Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco ?

Sign-up Next time we write about Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, we'll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.

Organizations in this Story

Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco

More News

The Record Network