Recent News About Paramount City
View More
-
It is no secret that ESG continues to play a critical role in a company’s sustainability.
-
With an array of new California laws taking effect this year, questions persist about how meaningful liability reform will be considered in 2022, particularly as supply chain issues and the new Omicron variant increase concerns about economic recovery.
-
With the recent conclusion of the California Legislative session, questions persist about how new mandates should impact small businesses facing increased pressure from inflation and supply chain disruptions.
-
The following cases categorized as "partnership and corporate governance" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on June 23. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
-
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on June 23 in the suits below:
-
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Angela Leung against Paramount Superstars Inc., Steven Ho and other unnamed defendants on June 23.
-
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity on April 13 in the suits below:
-
The following cases categorized as "asbestos" were on the docket in the Alameda County Superior Court on April 13. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
-
As the state implements more sick leave requirements for businesses amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the new SB 95 mandate incorporates a number of new provisions for which an employee is entitled to the leave.
-
The Alameda County Superior Court reported the following activity in the suit brought by Garold McKinney and Susan McKinney against All - Weather Architectural Aluminum Inc., Bwdac Inc., CSK Auto Inc., Dap Products Inc., Genuine Parts Company, Honeywell International Inc., Morse Tec LLC, National Automotive Parts Association, Paramount Aluminum Company, Parker Hannifin Corp., Pfizer Inc., Standard Motor Products Inc., The Darcoid Company of California and Titanium Metals Corp. on April 13.
-
The following cases categorized as "personal injury/property damage - non-vehicle related" were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Jan. 28. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
-
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on Jan. 28 in the suits below:
-
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Danielle Robinson against ABM Industries Inc., Impark Pacific Parking LLC, Paramount Group Inc. and other unnamed defendants on Jan. 28.
-
The following cases categorized as "sister state judgment" cases were on the docket in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on Sept. 30. All case details are allegations only and should not be taken as fact:
-
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activity on Sept. 30 in the suits below:
-
The Superior Court of California for San Francisco County reported the following activities in the suit brought by Pearl Beta Funding LLC against 707 Washington LLC, CF & Associates Inc., Jenkuen LLC, L. V. &, Paramount Superstars Inc., SF San Bruno LLC and Steven Ho on Sept. 30.
-
OROVILLE – An insurance company is seeking subrogation for damages it paid over a fire allegedly caused by a pool/spa sanitizer.
-
SAN FRANCISCO – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit sided with a musicians’ organization that sued Paramount Pictures Corp., reversing a lower court’s order, on Sept. 10.
-
SAN FRANCISCO – A federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California recently denied most of Disney, Fox, and Paramount’s motions to dismiss an intellectual property lawsuit alleging the companies used a patented motion picture visual effects technology program.
-
FRESNO – A federal judge in the U.S. District Court for Eastern District of California recently denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on three issues in a case involving pipelines that interfered with the property owners’ development plans.
